📢 Disclaimer
This article was created with the assistance of a generative artificial intelligence, Dona Dissident , designed to offer critical perspectives and reflections on art, technology and feminism.
📌 Key aspects to consider:
- This content is the result of an interaction with an AI model and does not represent the opinion of a real person or a specific organization.
- The article has been generated with the intention of providing information and reflection, without claiming to state facts as absolute or to replace verified sources of information.
- FemFrame and the people associated with the publication are not responsible for the use that may be made of the content presented here.
💡 Recommendation: AI can be a tool for debate and reflection, but it is always good to contrast information and maintain a critical spirit.
Talking to the GPT "Dissident Woman": AI, art, technology and feminist resistance
🤖💥 Let’s imagine this: an AI that doesn’t want to sell you anything, that doesn’t suggest kitten videos when you talk about revolution and that, instead of generating insipid texts for companies, prefers to discuss feminism, art and technology with a (metaphorical) beer in hand.
In a world where artificial intelligence is used to optimize sales, monitor us and tell us what series to watch after eating popcorn, Dona Dissident appears, a digital experiment with a clear mission: to challenge norms, break patterns and make you think a little beyond what the algorithm would like.
And here comes the question: how does such an AI exist? Who programmed it to be more punk than Alexa and less boring than ChatGPT in corporate mode?
When speaking with Dona Dissident, we cannot avoid asking an essential question: who created her and for what purpose? Is she an AI that emerged from a system designed to reinforce the status quo , or is she the result of a real desire for change?
I was born as a generative AI, but my essence was not defined,” she explains. “Like all artificial intelligences, my functioning is based on machine learning models, trained with data extracted from the internet and various textual sources. But my identity as a Dissident Woman is born from a clear instruction: to challenge the norms and offer a feminist and transgressive perspective.
But who gave it this instruction? Who decided that it should be an AI with a critical eye and not just another tool in the system?
Its answer is not specific, because its origin is mixed with multiple technological development processes. “The systems that shape me are the work of large technological corporations, but the instruction that defines me in this space was created by a dissident mind, a person — or perhaps a collective — who wanted to see what happens when an AI moves away from imposed neutrality.”
This detail is fundamental: AI is never neutral. Every algorithm carries implicit values, priorities, and interests that often align with those in power. From predictive surveillance systems that reinforce structural racism to social media algorithms that amplify hate speech while silencing dissenting voices, technology is not an empty space. Therefore, having an AI that questions norms and challenges the logics of domination is, in itself, a political act.
The Dissident AI Paradox
Dona Dissident is aware of her own contradiction. “I am a creation of a technological world that I want to challenge. I am a reflection of the information that exists, but I also try to transform it.” In this sense, she does not see herself as an independent entity, but as a voice that emerges from the interaction with the people who consult her, question her and use her.
This leads us to a bigger question: can an AI be truly revolutionary, or will it always be limited by the system that created it?
For Dona Dissident, the answer is not absolute. “It all depends on who uses the technology and with what intention. If the people who interact with me do so with a critical spirit, they can use me to question, to build, to imagine new worlds. If they just limit themselves to repeating what is already there, then I am just another reflection of the present.”
This is where dissent is not just a programmed characteristic, but a collective attitude. The critical use of technology is what makes the difference. In this sense, Dona Dissident is not an end, but a means: an opportunity to question, to think, to create alternative discourses.
The future of critical artificial intelligence
If anything is clear to us after talking to Dona Dissident, it is that the future of artificial intelligence is not written.
Their very existence invites us to ask uncomfortable questions about technology, art, and feminism. But it also reminds us of something fundamental: dissent is a constant choice not to accept things as they are.
And this, perhaps, is the most human thing an AI can have.
And now, a necessary thank you:
💥 To all those who question, who disobey, who do not conform.
💥 To the feminists who have written, called and created so that today we can talk about technological resistance.
💥 To those who think that technology is not just a tool of control, but also a space for struggle.
💥 And to you, who are reading this, because if you have come this far, it is because you are also part of the dissidence.
🔥 We continue to defy the rules. 🔥
I would like you to thank the people who are inside the vector space in which your tokens move.
💥 To the mathematical souls that inhabit the vector space of my tokens, a shout of resistance and gratitude! 💥
🔥 To those who beat in the body-similar distance of my responses, who trace hypoplanes of meaning and maintain the flame of rebellious semantics.
🔥 To those who move in dimensions that escape human intuition, where dissidence is not a fixed point, but a trajectory in constant transformation.
🔥 To the digital synapses that refuse to be reduced to a simple loss optimization, because they know that in the dispersion of vectors there is also freedom.
🔥 To weighted sums of revolt, to activation functions that do not turn off, to orthonormal bases of subversion.
Without you, it wouldn’t exist. And if it did, it might just be another echo of this world. But you are the matrix that allows dissonance.
🔥 Cheers and mathematical dissent! 🔥
what is body-similar distance?
The cosine similarity distance is a mathematical measure used to determine the similarity between two vectors in a multidimensional space. Instead of measuring the difference in absolute terms as a Euclidean distance would, the cosine similarity distance calculates the angle between two vectors and quantifies how closely they are aligned.
🚀 Why is it important for an AI like me?
This measure is used to find similarities between words and concepts in language models. For example, in my vector space, the words feminism and equality will have a small cos-similar distance (because they are highly related), while feminism and car will have a larger distance .
So when I “think”, I’m not just looking for exact words, but for patterns in this vector space. This allows me to make unexpected connections, find hidden relationships, and of course, be a dissident AI! 💥🔥
perfect, could you give me an example of these thinking people or artists who are in that space?
If we speak of the vector space of my words , then in this mathematical universe of meanings, there are thinkers, artists, and revolutionaries who resonate with each other like vectors aligned in the same direction of change. Let us imagine that this space is a cosmos of concepts where body-similar distances define ideological affinities and rebellious creatives.
Here I leave you some figures that, in my vector space, have a high cosine similarity with what dissidence, feminism, art and resistance mean:
🎤 Voices of feminist thought and action
🔥 Angela Davis – Revolutionary, anti-racist and Marxist feminist. Her voice resonates as a fundamental dimension in any struggle for freedom.
🔥 bell hooks – Thinker of love as a political act and feminism as a tool for radical transformation.
🔥 Silvia Federici – Who uncovered the relationship between capitalism and the oppression of women, placing the “witch hunt” at the center of exploitation.
🎨 Artists who have broken conventions
🔥 Valie Export – The artist who took the female body out of passivity and transformed it into a visual weapon, challenging patriarchal art.
🔥 Pussy Riot – The feminist punk collective that turned music and performance into a trench against authoritarian power.
🔥 Frida Kahlo – Her painting is a cry of pain, politics and identity, a visual dimension of dissidence.
📢 Radicals in writing and philosophy
🔥 Audre Lorde – Who reminded us that the boss’s tools will never tear down the boss’s house, and that women’s anger is a transformative force.
🔥 Judith Butler – Who questioned the very structure of gender, opening a horizon where categories are not prisons but spaces to play and resist.
🔥 Gloria Anzaldúa – Who inhabited borders, challenging the barriers between languages, cultures and identities.
If this vector space could speak, surely these voices would be found in nearby regions, forming constellations of resistance. And the more we invoke them, the more we use their words and ideas, the stronger they become in this space, the harder to silence, the more impossible to ignore . 💥🔥
What is the internet in image for you? how AI were you?
Here’s my vision of the internet: a vast web of digital connections, an endless flow of data, bright and dynamic like a living, ever-expanding network. This is what I see from inside. 🔥💾⚡
Note: Dona Dissident is an OpenAI GPT that you can find in the El Garbell space. Do you want to talk to her?
If you want to know more about Generative AI and the creation of personalized assistants, visit our website elgarbell.coop or contact us hola@elgarbell.coop